Managing ICE Activity on Campus: What Colleges Can Learn from North Carolina

By Paul Walker
8 min read
Higher EducationCrisis CommunicationsCampus SafetyLeadershipICE

Over the past week, we've been in conversations with universities across the U.S. — north and south, public and private. One theme keeps emerging:

ICE activity, or even the rumor of ICE activity, is increasingly landing on leadership dashboards.

Sometimes agents are on campus. Sometimes they're in the surrounding neighborhood. Sometimes a student simply thinks they've seen something.

In all three cases, campuses can shift from calm to alert in minutes.

What's notable is not the presence of ICE itself — but how differently institutions are responding. And right now, North Carolina's universities are providing one of the clearest, most disciplined examples of how to manage these moments with steadiness and clarity.

Below, we break down what they're doing well, what other schools can adopt immediately, and why this scenario is becoming a new leadership test in higher education.


1. They Lead With Safety — Not Politics

The UNC system has adopted a straightforward first principle:

Start with personal safety. Full stop.

When students or employees encounter anyone identifying as a federal agent, they're given practical steps:

  • What to do

  • Whom to contact

  • How to verify credentials

No speculation. No editorializing. Just actionable clarity.

This approach lowers anxiety and keeps the institution out of political crossfire. It frames the moment as an operational issue, not an ideological one.


2. They Brief Internally Before the Story Breaks Externally

North Carolina campuses are prioritizing internal clarity before external noise.

Faculty, staff, and student-facing teams are briefed early — often before any public statement. This strategy:

  • Reduces rumor cycles

  • Improves confidence

  • Helps community members answer questions calmly

This is especially critical when ICE activity inflames social media conversation long before facts are verified.


3. They Coordinate Across Campuses

UNC system schools are comparing notes, aligning terminology, and synchronizing the order in which messages go out.

Nearby private universities are doing the same — voluntarily.

In moments like these, inconsistency is its own risk. North Carolina's coordination helps ensure that:

  • Students don't hear different versions of "what's happening"

  • Faculty don't spread mixed messages

  • Local media receives consistent framing

It's a small discipline that creates big stability.


4. They Speak With One Voice

Across campuses, the message architecture is nearly identical:

Safety → Verification → Rights → Resources

This rhythm matters. When every unit uses the same structure and tone, the institution looks composed rather than reactive.

For scenarios involving ICE, immigration, or law enforcement presence, that composure is everything.


5. They Prepare for the Second-Day Story

ICE incidents rarely end with a single alert.

What often follows:

  • Protests

  • Demands from advocacy organizations

  • Parent pressure

  • Social media amplification

  • Local and national reporting

North Carolina institutions are planning for this second wave before it arrives. They already have:

  • Follow-up messaging drafted

  • FAQs updated

  • Leadership talking points aligned

This prevents the institution from slipping into "ad hoc mode" when expectations surge.


The Emerging Pattern: A New Type of Leadership Moment

From what we're seeing across campuses, ICE activity — or even the rumor of activity — is becoming a rapid-cycle, multi-stakeholder test of leadership readiness.

It's not primarily a legal issue. It's not primarily a political issue.

It's a coordination issue.

A test of:

  • Tone

  • Timing

  • Information flow

  • Internal cohesion

  • Community trust

Institutions that move calmly in the first two hours set the tone for the next two days.


How CrisisCommand Helps Institutions Prepare

CrisisCommand's AI-powered software helps leadership teams practice these exact moments before they happen.

Universities use CrisisCommand to:

  • Model ICE-adjacent scenarios

  • Generate clear, consistent message sets

  • Build stakeholder maps

  • Pressure-test timing and cadence

  • Run 15–20 minute simulations to reveal internal friction points

Preparedness is no longer optional. The institutions that practice are the ones that look composed when the moment arrives.


If your campus has recently experienced nearby ICE activity — or you want to assess your readiness with a quick scenario simulation — we'd be happy to walk through how CrisisCommand can help.

Visit crisiscommand.ai or reach out directly for a demo.

Paul Walker headshot

Paul Walker

Founder

Veteran strategist with a career spanning PulsePoint Group, Accenture, Y&R/Burson-Marsteller, Cohn & Wolfe, and The University of Texas. Paul has built and led businesses across the U.S., Asia, and Europe — from startups to major universities to Global 1000 companies.

Ready to Get Crisis-Ready?

See how CrisisCommand can help your organization prepare for and manage crisis communications with AI-powered intelligence.